H↔AI
Study 01 · 2026 Spring
AI Interactional Roles: Dominant vs Collaborative
Drawing on Storch’s pair dynamics model, we manipulate the AI’s role across two conditions and compare effects on elementary EFL learners’ task performance and L2 learning.
- RQ1
- How can generative AI support learners’ active task engagement during interactional tasks?
- RQ2
- How do different AI interactional roles affect task performance and language development?
- Measures
- Total turns, mean words per turn, topic initiations, accuracy of questions and suggestions (pre–post)
H↔H+AI
Study 02 · 2026 Fall
When, to Whom, and How LLM Participates?
We establish pedagogical criteria for when an LLM should speak, to whom, and with which dialogue act as it joins two learners’ collaborative English dialogue. Collecting learner–learner–AI conversations in real elementary EFL classrooms, we build a dataset and benchmark.
- RQ1
- How can a dialogue act schema be defined for an LLM that facilitates collaborative language learning among young EFL learners?
- RQ2
- How closely do LLM evaluators match teachers when judging the appropriateness of LLM dialogue acts under this schema?
- RQ3
- How appropriately do off-the-shelf LLMs choose when to intervene and which dialogue act to use?
- Methods
- Learner–learner–AI dialogues from ~100 students in four elementary EFL classes → initial schema → finalized with teacher feedback and annotation → comparison of GPT, Claude, Gemini, Llama, Qwen, and others